Chelsea vs Tottenham participant scores: Spurs proceed depressing Premier League kind
dreadful season continued with yet one more defeat on Thursday night time by the hands of London rivals .
Cole Palmer ended a run of 10 video games and not using a purpose or help for Chelsea, offering a luxurious cross for Enzo Fernandez to move dwelling the sport’s solely purpose.
Tottenham have all the time struggled at Chelsea and this defeat stretched their winless run at Stamford Bridge to 9 video games in all competitions.
Commercial
The Blues have now stored clear sheets in three consecutive Premier League dwelling video games, profitable their final 5 and placing themselves firmly within the race for Champions League soccer consequently, with simply two factors separating them from fourth positioned Manchester Metropolis, and on from Newcastle United in fifth.
Whereas Tottenham’s focus is evidently on the Europa League at this stage of the season, latest home performances will fear beneath stress supervisor Ange Postecoglou.
His facet at the moment are winless in 4 within the Premier League and have failed to attain in 4 of their final six in all competitions.
Chelsea participant scores
Robert Sanchez: 81%
Though he solely needed to make two saves, these pictures have been equal to 0.74 targets prevented and he accomplished six lengthy passes, three of which went straight via to Tottenham’s remaining third.
Commercial
Marc Cucurella: 68%
A strong, if unspectacular outing from the Spanish full-back. Received three tackles and made two clearances however supplied little in possession.
Trevoh Chalobah: 72%
Didn’t lose a single aerial or floor duel throughout the recreation and backed that up with one large likelihood created, finishing 49 of his 54 tried passes all through the sport.
Levi Colwill: 61 %
Took the joint-most touches of any Chelsea participant with 74, finishing 58 passes embrace eight lengthy passes – however didn’t win a single deal with and solely gained three possessions within the defensive third.
Malo Gusto: 63%
Malo Gusto was capable of make two interceptions and full six clearances as a part of a strong defensive show from the Blues’ backline.
Commercial
Enzo Fernandez: 80%
Apart from scoring the one purpose of the sport, the Argentinian additionally accomplished the second-highest quantity of ultimate third passes with 16 and tried a joint-high three take-ons in a high quality efficiency.
Moises Caicedo: 66%
Though providing little when it comes to creativity, Caicedo was significantly spectacular within the first half, profitable 4 tackles and finishing each certainly one of his tried 23 passes – though 4 of his 18 did go astray within the second half.
Cole Palmer: 76%
Ended an extended watch for a purpose or help by supplying a improbable cross for Enzo Fernandez to move dwelling. Each of his pictures have been heading in the right direction and he created one different likelihood in a a lot improved show.
Commercial
Pedro Neto: 64%
Created two possibilities, one labeled as a giant likelihood and took two pictures throughout the recreation. Nonetheless, each of these pictures have been off course and his two take-on makes an attempt weren’t accomplished.
Jadon Sancho: 65%
Managed a powerful 5 ball recoveries and 7 touches within the opposition field in his 68 minutes. Did nevertheless miss a giant likelihood along with his one shot heading in the right direction simply earlier than the half-time whistle.
Nicolas Jackson: 44%
Removed from a classic efficiency from Jackson, who accomplished simply eight passes and took two low-percentage pictures for an xG of solely 0.14.
Tottenham participant scores
Guglielmo Vicario: 81%
Saved 4 of the 5 pictures he confronted, three of which got here from contained in the field. Was wrong-footed for the one purpose of the sport.
Commercial
Future Udogie: 64%
Tried to get into harmful attacking areas, taking six touches within the Chelsea field and finishing six passes into the ultimate third, however in the end couldn’t create any possibilities for his facet.
Micky van de Ven: 62%
Solely accomplished two lengthy passes and gained simply two tackles, however did a minimum of full extra clearances than any outfield Tottenham participant with six.
Cristian Romero: 64%
Accomplished simply two of eight tried lengthy passes and misplaced his solely aerial duel. He was a minimum of constant along with his shorter passing, finishing 48 of his different 50 passes.
Djed Spence: 63%
Taking part in a uncommon recreation on his favoured proper facet, Spence did handle to make 5 clearances and win two aerial duels however was a little bit careless within the lead as much as the Chelsea purpose.
Commercial
Lucas Bergvall: 62%
Had simply 31 touches and supplied little with the ball however did okay out of possession, finishing two clearances and two interceptions in addition to profitable one deal with.
Rodrigo Bentancur: 65%
The Uruguayan accomplished 51 of his 55 passes, however solely 9 of these have been ahead passes and he was dispossessed from a poor contact on two occassions.
James Maddison: 60%
Though he did create Tottenham’s one large likelihood and accomplished 34 of his 35 passes, Maddison was unable to finish both of his two tried crosses and gained possession for his workforce simply as soon as in his 88 minutes.
Son Heung-min: 65%
Missed Tottenham’s largest likelihood of the sport along with his one shot heading in the right direction scoring an xG of 0.59, however did a minimum of register two pictures and full 13 passes within the remaining third, probably the most of any Spurs participant.
Commercial
Wilson Odobert: 61%
A largely nameless show from the ex-Burnley man who accomplished solely 18 passes and was dispossessed on three events, greater than every other participant on the sphere. Did a minimum of create on likelihood for Spurs.
Dominic Solanke: 40%
No participant took fewer touches than Dominic Solanke with simply 21. The previous Bournemouth man didn’t register a shot, gained possession within the remaining third simply as soon as and accomplished a measly six passes.
How do Squawka participant scores work?
Squawka’s new participant ranking system is wholly stats-based. Participant scores are based mostly on the numbers they put up throughout a variety of on-ball occasions, from targets scored to tackles gained.
Commercial
We tailor-made every rating to the gamers’ respective positions utilizing intensive analysis and experience. For instance, forwards are rated on metrics like pictures heading in the right direction, touches within the opposition field, and large possibilities created. In the meantime, centre-backs are rewarded for profitable aerial duels, making blocks, profitable long-range passes, and many others.
*Utilizing Bookmaker/Affiliate hyperlinks on squawka.com might earn us a fee, at no extra price to you. 18+ solely. T&Cs apply. Please gamble responsibly. For extra data, go to gambleaware.org.
