Italian employment lawyer Michele La Francesca believes Atalanta ahead Ademola Lookman can terminate his contract with “simply clause.”
La Francesco defined in a Twitter thread that the alleged settlement on a summer season switch between Lookman and Atalanta would violate employment legislation if it contained a non-compete clause.
Commercial
It’s definitely no secret that Ademola Lookman needs to hitch Inter Milan.
Moreover, the Atalanta ahead has overtly hit out at his present membership for purportedly .
Lookman had already requested to depart Atalanta final summer season, with Paris Saint-Germain making a proposal.
La Dea stored maintain of Lookman, Nonetheless, they did so with an settlement that they’d enable the participant to depart this summer season.
Now, Lookman needs to depart for Inter. Nonetheless, Atalanta have already rejected two bids from the Nerazzurri.
Atalanta CEO Luca Percassi has that La Dea don’t wish to promote Lookman to a crew in Serie A. That is part of the settlement from final summer season.
Commercial
Nonetheless, an Italian employment lawyer has a unique perspective on the state of affairs.
Italian Employment Lawyer Claims “Ademola Lookman Can Terminate Atalanta Contract With Simply Trigger”
BERGAMO, ITALY – MAY 12: Ademola Lookman of Atalanta warms up previous to the Serie A match between Atalanta and AS Roma at Gewiss Stadium on Might 12, 2025 in Bergamo, Italy. (Photograph by Marco Luzzani/Getty Photographs)
Italian employment lawyer Michela La Francesca explains that “the settlement on a switch between membership and participant is undisputed, each events admit it.”
“Atalanta declare that it’s solely legitimate for transfers overseas,” he continues.
Commercial
“Nonetheless, if it had been because the membership claims, then this settlement can be null and void. As a result of it will represent a non-compete clause, which is prohibited by Article 26 of the Legistlative Decree quantity 36/21, paragraph 6.”
La Francesca explains that this text stipulates that “A contract can not include non-compete clauses. Or any clauses that restrict the skilled freedom of an athlete for the interval following the termination of the contract itself.”
“Nor can it’s built-in, through the course of the connection, with such provisions.”
“With that mentioned, it appears unlikely that the events had been unaware of this rule and entered ino a considerably void settlement,” La Francesca writes.
Commercial
“The participant’s model (that the events reached an settlement on a switch at a set price) is due to this fact extra believable.”
“From this attitude, invoking =Article 14 of the FIFA Laws (which might enable Lookman to be launched with ‘simply trigger’ contemplating the membership’s unfair conduct) can be a possible possibility,” writes La Francesca.
