Barcelona as soon as once more discover their title getting related to the refereeing controversy in La Liga, as Actual Madrid have brazenly stepped up its criticism in latest weeks.
Certainly, in keeping with , Actual Madrid officers declare that latest refereeing errors should not coincidental and argue that so long as doubts exist across the Negreira case, Barcelona will proceed to profit from choices on the pitch.
Commercial
The strain escalated after Actual Madrid’s latest match towards Actual Sociedad, the place controversial officiating noticed Dean Huijsen get despatched off within the first half.
What Is the Negreira Case?
The Negreira case centres on funds, totalling greater than €7 million, made by Barcelona to Jose Maria Enriquez Negreira, former vice-president of the CTA, between 2001 and 2018.
The Catalans have persistently maintained that the funds had been for scouting stories and referee evaluation stories, however the investigation is ongoing, and the matter is in courtroom.
Actual Madrid are pointing fingers at Barcelona. (Photograph by Michael Regan/Getty Photographs)
Commercial
Former managers Luis Enrique and Ernesto Valverde are , as is president Joan Laporta.
, formally collaborating within the proceedings, and intend to pursue the matter to the very finish, as president Florentino Perez confirmed to the membership’s members.
Actual Madrid improve the strain
Actual Madrid have now made a transparent shift in technique of their battle towards the refereeing system.
Whereas beforehand the main target was primarily on choices affecting their very own matches, the membership’s messaging, primarily via RMTV, has more and more drawn direct comparisons with Barcelona.
Commercial
Penalties, pink playing cards and disciplinary measures are scrutinised aspect by aspect. RM TV has notably highlighted the truth that between February 2016 and March 2018, Barcelona didn’t concede a single penalty – framing this as proof of beneficial therapy.
From Barcelona’s perspective, the accusations type a part of a wider marketing campaign to delegitimise the membership. The membership has at all times harassed that the funds had been authorized on the time and that no proof has been offered proving refereeing affect.