Polish referee Szymon Marciniak, who officiated the second leg of the Champions League conflict between Atletico Madrid and Actual Madrid, has shared particulars about probably the most debated moments of the match.
The fixture ended with Actual Madrid securing their place within the quarter-finals, however a serious speaking level emerged when Julian Alvarez’s penalty was disallowed.
The incident sparked widespread dialogue, and Marciniak has now revealed what went on behind the scenes.
What actually occurred?
Through the recreation, Alvarez stepped as much as take the penalty, however the aim was dominated out after a evaluation. The rationale? The Argentine striker unintentionally made contact with the ball twice when hanging it.
Marciniak defined that he was the one who initially suspected the double contact and knowledgeable the VAR officers about it.
He was virtually sure that Alvarez had made two contacts with the ball, prompting the video assistant referees to analyse the footage fastidiously.
“I used to be the one who knowledgeable the VAR referees that there was a 99% probability that Alvarez touched the ball twice, and so they checked it completely,” he mentioned.
There had been rumours suggesting that Actual Madrid gamers had , however Marciniak dismissed these claims outright.
“It’s completely false that Mbappe instructed me something in regards to the two touches.”
Going through the scenario
The Polish official additionally admitted that this was a uncommon scenario in soccer. In all his years as a referee, he had by no means encountered such an incident.
Nonetheless, he emphasised that gamers are totally conscious of the principles and that the choice was made based on the official laws.
“To be sincere, I’ve by no means confronted a scenario like this in my refereeing profession,” he confessed, though insisting that “the gamers know the principles.”
UEFA responded
To clear up any confusion surrounding the incident, UEFA later launched a video .
The footage confirmed that Alvarez’s standing foot had made slight contact with the ball simply earlier than he struck it, resulting in a violation of the principles.
Below Legislation 14.1 of the Legal guidelines of the Recreation, this meant that the aim needed to be disallowed, as confirmed by the VAR evaluation.
Supply: