Home LALIGA Actual Madrid TV questions La Liga refereeing after Valverde crimson card name: ‘This can be a scandal’

Actual Madrid TV questions La Liga refereeing after Valverde crimson card name: ‘This can be a scandal’

by Soccer-News

Actual Madrid secured a vital , maintaining their La Liga title hopes alive.

Nevertheless, as a substitute of the end result dominating the headlines, the main focus has shifted to controversy, particularly the sending-off of Federico Valverde.

Commercial

The Uruguayan midfielder as soon as once more proved his significance on the pitch, contributing with a purpose in a high-intensity derby.

But, his efficiency was overshadowed by a late crimson card following a problem on Alex Baena.

As issues stand, Actual Madrid stay 4 factors behind Barcelona, however they now face the potential for being for at the least the subsequent match towards Mallorca.

Explosion on Actual Madrid TV

In consequence, the response from the membership’s media channel, Actual Madrid TV, was intense.

Throughout their post-match evaluation, they criticised the referee’s resolution, arguing that the punishment didn’t match the problem.

Commercial

“This can be a scandal, a shame. It’s a transparent yellow-card foul, it’s blatant, but when we keep in mind what occurred in Pamplona, we are able to perceive this and why VAR didn’t name it,” they stated.

Past that, statistical comparisons throughout La Liga paint an image that many supporters discover tough to simply accept.

It is because Actual Madrid are at present one of many least aggressive groups within the league by way of fouls dedicated, with simply 286, second solely to Barcelona’s 267.

Valverde was despatched off towards Atletico Madrid. (Photograph by Angel Martinez/Getty Pictures)

But, regardless of this, they’ve obtained seven crimson playing cards this season, making them one of the vital penalised sides.

Commercial

In distinction, each Barcelona and Atletico Madrid have seen simply two gamers despatched off every.

Extra from RMTV

The criticism from Actual Madrid TV went even additional, questioning not simply the choice itself however the story that usually follows such incidents.

“Folks will say the issue is Actual Madrid TV, which makes movies. We’re doing this to level out that this could by no means be a crimson card—it’s a textbook yellow. 

“Baena touches the ball, clears it, and that’s why Valverde doesn’t contact it. He didn’t attempt to smash the derby; he tried to smash Actual Madrid, which isn’t the identical factor. 

“Later, we’ll watch ‘Tiempo de Justificación,’ the place they could even agree with him,” they defined.

Commercial

They continued by expressing scepticism over how the choice can be defended in post-match evaluation, stating,

“I’m certain he’ll justify this name and say that each the referee and the VAR official had been proper. That may’t be; you shouldn’t ship a participant off for this. 

“Then they’ll attempt to feed us a bunch of nonsense, speaking about depth, about there being no ball. 

“After all, there’s a ball, however Valverde can’t attain it as a result of Baena touches it,” they concluded.

Supply:

You may also like

Leave a Comment