Barcelona think about submitting criticism over no-penalty name – What the foundations say about Marc Pubill goal-kick

Barcelona have been left livid on Wednesday night time after their 2-0 loss to Atletico Madrid within the first leg of their Champions League quarter-final at Camp Nou, however with the referee, relatively than themselves. The sport turned on a sending off for Pau Cubarsi, which Julian Alvarez punished once more with a objective from the free-kick, however the Catalan facet felt they have been due at the very least a penalty within the second interval.

The incident in query occurred when Atletico goalkeeper Juan Musso positioned the ball down inside his six-yard field, after which performed it to Marc Pubill. The defender proceeded to cease the ball along with his hand, and play it again to Musso, who performed on, because the Barcelona gamers appealed for a handball.

, whereas Marcus Rashford mentioned there was no debate over it. , asking what the purpose of VAR is, if not for this. Diego Simeone known as it ‘frequent sense’ to not give a penalty.

What the foundations say about Marc Pubill name

The foundations would seem to rule in Barcelona’s favour. As highlighted by Sport and MD, Rule 16 of the rules state the next.

-The ball have to be stationary and is kicked from any level throughout the objective space by a participant of the defending workforce -The ball is in play when it’s kicked and clearly strikes -Opponents have to be outdoors the penalty space till the ball is in play If, after the ball is in play, the kicker touches the ball once more earlier than it has touched one other participant, an oblique free kick is awarded; if the kicker commits a handball offence: a direct free kick is awarded a penalty kick is awarded if the offence occurred contained in the kicker’s penalty space, until the kicker was the goalkeeper, during which case an oblique free kick is awarded

There was some debate over whether or not Lamine Yamal had entered the world earlier than the goal-kick was taken, however this solely seems to occur as soon as the goal-kick is – in Barcelona’s eyes – taken by Musso.

Barcelona think about submitting criticism to UEFA

Based on , Barcelona are contemplating submitting an official letter of criticism to UEFA, stating their dissatisfaction with the officiating. It’s a measure with out actual consequence, as UEFA have already got a referee assessor current at each recreation who may have written a report on the occasions. They’d reply to the Blaugrana, however out of courtesy and with out taking motion.

Commercial

Precedent within the Champions League

As highlighted by , there may be loads of precedent. Throughout an Argentine league recreation between Independiente and Colon, the referee uncared for to present a penalty for the same incident, however after a VAR evaluate, determined to take action. The identical factor occurred in 2024 within the Champions League between Membership Brugge and Aston Villa, the place the Belgian facet got a spot-kick when Tyrone Mings picked up the ball, after Emiliano Martinez performed it to him.

Alternatively, later that yr, David Raya handed the ball to Gabriel Magalhaes inside his six-yard field from a goal-kick throughout a conflict between Arsenal and Bayern Munich. The referee determined to permit the goal-kick to be taken once more by Gabriel after he picked the ball up and performed it again to Raya.

Related posts

Forest’s two ambitions stay of their grasp throughout season of upheaval

Arne Slot reveals the one ‘good factor’ from Liverpool’s defeat to PSG

Barcelona ahead hits out at referee over blunder vs Atletico Madrid – ‘It’s clear to me, it’s a penalty’